Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marilouise Van Zyl vs Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zyl vs Ndungane analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Marilouise Van Zyl vs Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zyl 1 - 0 Ndungane
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zyl has won 41.73% of points on their second serve, while Ndungane has won 39.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zyl, in recent form, has won 61.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ndungane has won 57.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.82% and 35.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zyl has saved 51.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ndungane has saved 47.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zyl has won 68.75% of matches played (W/L 11/ 5), with Ndungane winning 37.5% (W/L 3/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zyl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11). Ndungane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Zyl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4), where as Ndungane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 3/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zyl winning 1 times and Ndungane being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zyl winning 2 and Ndungane winning 0. The last match between Zyl and Ndungane was at the W35 Hillcrest, 30-06-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Marilouise Van Zyl getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zyl and Ndungane have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zyl winning 0 times and Ndungane 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zyl winning 0, and Ndungane 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zyl has played against opponents with an average rank of 59.06 while Ndungane has played against players with an average rank of 102.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zyl has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ndungane has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zyl has converted 51.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ndungane has converted 52.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
50% (11-11)
Career Total W/L
27% (3-8)
69% (11-5)
YTD W/L
38% (3-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Marilouise Van Zyl vs Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zyl VS Ndungane
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Marilouise Van Zyl | Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:0 | 0:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (24/31) | 38% (15/39) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 33% (5/15) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (5/7) | 17% (4/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 77% (30/39) | 35% (11/31) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
11 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marilouise Van Zyl | Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (11/5) | 38% (3/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (22/14) | 39% (7/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (181/143) | 43% (58/78) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 59.06 | 102.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (497/751) | 54% (245/456) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (291/497) | 58% (142/245) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (106/254) | 39% (83/211) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (55/106) | 52% (25/48) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (374/737) | 43% (172/400) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 80% (4/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (10/15) | 38% (3/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (4/0) |
Marilouise Van Zyl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Donna Le Roux
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
54%
(
55 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
50 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Smriti Bhasin
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
11 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Niditra Rajmohan
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve %
50%
(
2 of
4)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
10
Total Points Won
1
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Grace Koenig
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nagomi Higashitani
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Erin Mckenzie
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Marilouise Van Zyl
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Unknown Player
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
11 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luise Helena Janse Van Rensburg
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linge Steenkamp
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
110)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
10
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
Player
Kaitlyn Leigh Ramduth
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
33%
(
16 of
48)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
17
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
Player
Alyssa Reguer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
Player
Kristen Seabury
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve %
56%
(
15 of
27)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
38
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarah Millard
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
46%
(
33 of
72)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 2-6 10-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzanie Pretorius
Player
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zyl Vs Ndungane Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zyl are available here and Ndungane photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
